A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Non-static method Ce_str::usage() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context

Filename: ce_str/pi.ce_str.php

Line Number: 26

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Non-static method Minimee::usage() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context

Filename: minimee/pi.minimee.php

Line Number: 12

SAHA - FOIP – SAH-2014-SRB-0007 – Request tracker

Various records of other investigations

Reference number: SAH-2014-SRB-0007
Submitting organisation: South African History Archive (SAHA)
Status: open
Date submitted: August 01, 2014
Stage(s): Initial request, court
Request description:

Please see request form for more detailed information about records requested

Initial request communication

Communication sent

Submission of PAIA request SAH-2014-SRB-0007
Sent on: August, 01 2014
Confirmation of receipt of PAIA request SAH-2014-SRB-0007
Sent on: August, 06 2014
Confirmation of receipt of PAIA request SAH-2014-SRB-0007 - follow up and request fee payment details
Sent on: August, 11 2014
Failure to respond to PAIA request SAH-2014-SRB-0007 within statutory time frame
Sent on: September, 05 2014
Repeated failure to respond to PAIA request SAH-2014-SRB-0007 within statutory time frame
Sent on: September, 15 2014

Response received

Response date: 2015-10-28
Response nature: Denied
Received within statutory period: No

Court

Application Description

APPLICATION DOCUMENTATION Notion of motion and founding affidavit with annexures, Applicant’s Replying Affidavit, Applicant’s Rule 28 Notice, Index to court papers, Applicant’s Heads of Argument, Notice of Set Down.

Defence Description

DEFENCE DOCUMENTATION:  Notice of Intention to Defend, Notice of Intention to Oppose and Rule 3(5) Filing Sheet, Answering Affirmation and Commissioned Confirmatory Affidavit of Elsie du Plessis, Commissioned Confirmatory Affidavit of Alexander Ellis, Respondents’ Supplementary Affirmation, Respondents’ Index to Heads of Argument, Respondents’ Heads of Argument, Respondents’ Chronology of Heads of Argument, Respondents’ bundle of authorities part 1,  Respondents’ bundle of authorities part 2 and Respondents’ Practice Note.

Outcome Description

Application was dismissed with costs.

Downloads

Court outcome - CaseNo5598_16_HighCourtJudgement_20180319.pdf
Court application - CaseNo5598_16_ReplyingSubmissions_20170816_OCRed.pdf
Court application - CaseNo5598_16_NoticeOfSetDown_20170421.pdf
Court defence - CaseNo5598_16_Resp_FS_PracNoteHeadsChronology_OCR_20161114.pdf
Court defence - CaseNo5598_16_Resp_BOA_P2_OCR_20161114.pdf
Court defence - CaseNo5598_16_Resp_BOA_P1_OCR_20161114.pdf
Court defence - CaseNo5598_16_Resp_Chronology_HOA_OCR_20161114.pdf
Court defence - CaseNo5598_16_Resp_HOA_OCR_20161114.pdf
Court defence - CaseNo5598_16_Resp_IndexBOA_OCR_20161114.pdf
Court defence - CaseNo5598_16_Resp_Suppl_Aff_OCR_20161110.pdf